Reports & Briefings

This briefing discusses the loopholes that some countries are pushing for in order to reduce the efforts they would have to make to cut emissions in the non-ETS sectors.

About 60% of the EU’s emissions are covered by national targets under the currently called Effort Sharing Decision (ESD). It includes sectors not covered by the Emissions Trading System, such as road transport, agriculture, waste and buildings. As part of its overall at least 40% emission reduction pledge for 2030, the EU agreed to cut emissions by 30% (from 2005 levels) from these non-ETS sectors. The 30% EU target will be divided into different Member State targets. It is important to note that in order for the EU to be in line with the objectives of the Paris Agreement, the -30% target would need to be substantially increased. The same applies for the national targets. It is deeply troubling that countries continue to look for ways to reduce their targets instead of increasing them.

This briefing discusses the loopholes that some countries are pushing for in order to reduce the efforts they would have to make to cut emissions in the non-ETS sectors. These loopholes include using:

  • the forest and land-use sector instead of reducing emissions in the non-ETS sectors (maximum 1.3 billion, likely proposed by the Commission: less than 300 million);
  • surplus from pre-2020 to fulfil obligations after 2020 (maximum 1.5 billion, likely zero as it will not be proposed by the Commission);
  • ETS allowances to meet targets in the non-ETS sectors  (maximum 300 million, likely proposed by the Commission: around 100 million).

Download  pdf CAN Europe Briefing: trick list of how countries can avoid climate action (547 KB)

See also our  pdf CAN Europe Briefing: No cheating from the start 13072016 (233 KB)

Latest Publications

  • Coal is out. Are the Western Balkans in?

    Are EU member-states in Southeast Europe ready for timely and just transition beyond coal? For the Western Balkans, membership hopefuls, the question is how much longer can public subsidies and Chinese loans keep coal zombie alive at growing cost to health, livelihoods, and the environment?
  • Submission - Feedback on ENTSOS' Proposals for TYNDP 2022 Storylines

    Future energy infrastructure planning in Europe needs to be fully aligned with the Paris Agreement. CAN Europe recommends to increase variation of TYNDP 2022 storylines by assessing higher ambition of greenhouse gas emission reductions. In order to reach the 1.5°C target of the Paris Agreement, a trajectory towards net-zero emissions in 2040 should be assessed. Instead of primarily opposing “decentralised” and “global” solutions in the TYNDP 2022 storylines, at least one scenario should analyse how to prepare European energy infrastructure for a 100% renewable energy system in the most efficient way, combining the best out of both “decentralised” and “global” futures.
See All: Climate & Energy Targets