A Perfect Match: Climate Action and Fair, Sustainable Development

In June of this year the former UN climate chief Christiana Figueres led a number of scientists to a call for deeper and faster action on climate change. The message she is sending is clear: if we want to avoid the most dangerous impacts of man-made climate change we need to do much more and we need to do it faster.

For scientific experts, environmental and development organizations, not only is the evidence clear – the urgency to act is glaring. The sense of urgency needs to move beyond scientists and NGOs to decision-makers who will design and implement plans to help our societies avoid the most catastrophic impacts climate change foreshadows.

 By Maeve McLynn, Finance and Subsidies Policy Coordinator at Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe

Originally published by on 11 September 2017.

 The Sustainable Development Goals offer the opportunity to answer Figueres’ call, and at the same time drive the solutions to the key challenges of our time, including the persistence of extreme poverty, rising inequality, social injustice and the depletion of natural resources. Addressing climate change cuts across numerous goals; for example, through improving access to sustainable energy, developing more sustainable food production practices and improving access to water and sanitation.

But if we don’t pursue faster and more ambitious climate action in a people-driven, fair and equitable way, we risk exacerbating the problems vulnerable people face. Without including communities who are already trying to overcome climate change impacts, the aspirations of Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals will only meet the needs of few while leaving behind the many.


When I first started campaigning on the issue of climate change, I came across a term that sums up the interface of our global climate crisis and the fight for greater social justice: ‘climate change affects everybody, but not equally’. I was about twenty years old. Apart from reading a few news articles and NGO newsletters, I had little knowledge about climate change. As a naïve but open-minded university student, I was eager to dig deeper into what this phrase really means.

After ten years of volunteering and working on climate change, I’m still learning. I am gaining a better understanding of the frightening science, the complex politics, and technological challenges to finally end our dangerous dependence on fossil fuels – one of the largest contributors to climate change. I am still discovering the deep and interconnected nature of inequality, and how the impacts of climate change will erode the well-intentioned measures that seek to provide basic human needs.

I have learned a great deal from the countless reports, statistics and figures on the science of climate change, reminding me daily of what is at stake if the international community fails to limit the rise in global temperature. I have spoken with the very people who personify the interface of climate change and inequality and whose stories turn the statistics and numbers into a fearsome reality of what climate change really means for people.

We cannot dispute that all countries – rich and poor – will face unprecedented economic, social and environmental challenges, even if we limit global temperature rise to well below 2 degrees Celsius. However, while climate change does not discriminate where it will wreak havoc, its victims do not have the equal opportunity to overcome the worst of its impacts.

Facing adverse effects such as consecutive crop failure and resource depletion, the average farmer in the Bolivian Andes will not have the same support to deal with those challenges as for example his or her European counterparts. A drought in Southern California means less water for gardening plants; a drought in Ethiopia means no water at all, neither for plants nor people. When floods tear through towns and cities, it will be the poorer families and neighbourhoods that will suffer more severely and take longer to recover from the damage incurred.

As I write, hurricanes and storms are ravaging the United States, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Caribbean islands in an unprecedented way. These extreme weather events are leaving devastation in their wake, with communities and businesses struggling to recover and rebuild their livelihoods. As the aftermath of extreme weather is revealed, again it will be the most vulnerable people who will struggle to pick up the pieces and move on.

The impacts of climate change is mercilessly exposing the deep and complex inequality within and between our countries. The people who already face daily battles towards achieving more prosperous lives will bear the brunt of the most dangerous consequences of the global climate crisis.


Though climate change exposes the severe inequality within our societies, there is much to be optimistic about as our countries and communities pursue efforts to address the challenge and make prosperity a reality for the many.

Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals mark the crossroads between climate change, poverty and inequality, cementing a collective vision that seeks to address our most pressing problems in an integrated way. The Agenda was further bolstered by the Paris Agreement on climate change, which sets the world on course towards a zero-carbon and climate resilient future. When both were adopted in 2015, it really marked a turning point for our future. The two global frameworks and their objectives lay the groundwork for more people-driven and community-owned sustainable development, setting about new ways in which we run our economies and societies. It is time to make these new pathways a reality.


A crucial element to addressing climate change and realising our sustainable development objectives is the transformation of our energy system. While shifting from fossil fuels to modern renewable energy brings about countless benefits to local environments and the climate, many other sectors also stand to gain a great deal from this transition.

Wide-scale renewable energy is taking hold globally, not only thanks to its falling prices but also to the abundance of solar and wind resources in previously untapped regions. This trend brings about additional benefits for employment; the International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that an additional six million jobs will be created globally through the energy transition by 2050.

This transition will also equitably and sustainably serve the needs of millions of people who currently do not have any access to energy, providing reliable electricity and connectivity to rural and urban communities. Doing so will, in turn have countless knock-on benefits for other societal needs such as access to healthcare and education, gender equality, access to water, sanitation and transport.

A key feature of the clean energy revolution is a people and community-driven approach which ensures the inclusion, consultation and ownership by people of their energy sources. The Agenda 2030 framework – through its human rights based approach – can enhance community energy initiatives, including through capacity-building within and between countries and regions, the transfer of renewable energy technologies, and through education and awareness-raising.


From 1990 to 2016, the number of natural disasters worldwide has more than doubled the total from the previous 89 years, with scientists pointing the finger at man-made climate change as an underlying cause. Poorer countries and communities are facing some of the worst impacts of a changing climate. At the same time, a great deal of investments taking place in these countries are not adapted to climate change and do not contribute to climate resilience. National development plans which target sectors from transport and infrastructure, social services, and healthcare provision as well as food production, are not currently equipped to cope with the growing effects of climate change.

Without an urgent scale-up of adaptation efforts, millions of livelihoods risk being destroyed, while the deep inequality that exists within our societies will continue to dominate the reality of vulnerable people all over the world, eroding the possibility for poorer people to become free from poverty.

That is where the added value of the Sustainable Development Goals comes in. Goal 13 on climate change, which refers to strengthening climate resilience and adaptive capacity as well as integrating climate action into national development plans, needs to be taken seriously by our governments. Implementing it can be the difference between saving few lives and saving many lives. It can safeguard vital services such as healthcare, water and sanitation, transport, electricity and food security. Through the underlining principles of Agenda 2030, it can ensure that the long-term ambitions of the Sustainable Development Goals are not thwarted by climate related disasters and impacts.

This will require substantial efforts – from drought to sea-level rise, countries need to be looking at innovative technological solutions to problems that are specific to their regions and integrating those solutions into their long-term development plans.


We are at the beginning of a long road to prosperity for all, where people and the planet are at the centre of our global efforts, and we have a unique opportunity to make it a successful journey. But that success, and the multiple benefits that it will bring to millions of people depends on the will of our global community to work collectively in the fight for greater equality and social justice, and against climate change.

Contact Communications


Ania Drążkiewicz
Communications Coordinator
Focus: EU climate & energy policies, UNFCCC
ania /at/
Work: +32 2894 4675
Mobile: +32 494 525 738 


Nicolas Derobert
Communications Coordinator 
Focus: fossil fuel subsidies, coal phase out
nicolas /at/ 
Work: +32 2894 4673
Mobile: +32 483 621 888


Stevan Vujasinović
Communications Coordinator for Southeast Europe
Focus: coal phase out
stevan /at/ 
Mobile: +381 (0)63 390 218

Latest Publications

  • Joint NGO statement on the Effort Sharing Regulation

    EU governments must step back from irreparably weakening Europe’s biggest climate law, six of Europe’s leading environmental NGOs have said, after talks between member states and the European Parliament ended in deadlock this week. 
  • CAN Europe letter ahead of the Energy Council on 18 December

    For Energy Council on 18 December Brussels, 13 December 2017 Dear Minister, Ahead of Energy Council on Monday 18 December, Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe would like to call on you to adopt an ambitious position on the Market Design Initiative, the Renewable Energy Directive, and the Governance of the Energy Union Regulation. Current proposals in the Estonian Presidency compromise texts for these files are not at all consistent with the EU’s commitments under the Paris Agreement and would endanger the transition to a clean, efficient and just energy system. Accelerating this transition will bring benefits to European citizens, offering them new rights and economic opportunities, delivering a safer climate, warm homes, clean air, and local green jobs. In order to maximise the potential social, economic and climate benefits from this legislation, the Council needs to raise their level of ambition and substantially improve on key elements. We urge you to support the priorities set out in the Annex to the email below. The Council now has the opportunity to improve its position in line with these priorities at the Energy Council meeting on 18 December. We urge you to include these points during the discussions. Yours sincerely, Wendel Trio Director, Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe   Annex: Priorities for Clean Energy Package files, Energy Council 18 Dec  Market Design Initiative A 550gCO2/kWh eligibility criterion for participation in capacity mechanisms Capacity mechanisms must be used only as a last resort and temporary solution. Their introduction should be conditional on the outcomes of robust Europe-wide resource adequacy assessments performed at the regional level. A 550gCO2/kWh eligibility criterion for participation in capacity mechanisms should be used to exclude the most carbon-intense plants from capacity payments.The latest compromise text from the Presidency removes the criterion of 550gCO2/kWh for existing plants, and further delays its introduction for new plants. This would mean public money would be diverted to coal plants, extending their lifetime and hampering the clean energy transition - a clear contradiction to Paris Agreement commitments. The Council must maintain the 550gCO2/kW criterion for all new and existing plants, and ensure it applies to all plants immediately after the regulation comes into force. Priority dispatch for renewable energy The Estonian Presidency proposals essentially remove the right for Member States to grant priority dispatch to new renewable projects from 2021, with only very limited exemptions and even lower thresholds than in the already restrictive Commission proposal. The Council needs to improve its position by securing priority dispatch not only for existing renewable energy capacity, but also new projects. Priority dispatch is needed to correct for market distortions which favour fossil fuel energy sources through subsidies and unpriced externalities. In particular, priority dispatch is essential for smaller installations, often community energy projects, and therefore for public confidence in the energy transition.  At the very least, the exemptions thresholds should be reverted back to those in the Commission proposal. Revised Renewable Energy Directive A binding target of at least 45% for 2030 A target of at least 45% is needed to accelerate renewables deployment in line with the Paris Agreement and ensure additional social, economic and health benefits. The current Council position of at least 27% was agreed upon before the successful outcome of the Paris Climate Conference and follows a Commission proposal based on outdated and overpriced cost assumptions for wind and solar. Such a low target would drastically slow down current levels of renewable energy deployment. The Council now needs to revise this target upwards. The ITRE Committee of the European Parliament recently supported a target of ‘at least 35%’. Binding national targets (Article 3) Binding national targets should be maintained as the best proven way to ensure Member States collectively achieve the EU renewables target, to cement investor confidence, to ensure balanced renewables deployment across the EU and to reduce capital costs for all Member States. Stronger definitions / rights for energy citizens and communities (Articles 2, 21 & 22) EU-level definitions of ‘renewable self-consumers’ and renewable energy communities should be supported. Renewable self-consumers should receive remuneration for electricity fed into the grid which also reflects its value to the environment and society. This will strengthen public support for the transition. National support schemes as a driver for renewable deployment (Article 4) The Council should cement its position behind national support schemes.This would allow Member States to enact technology-specific tenders in ways that are tailored to local conditions and needs - which is good for diversity of supply and energy security - and provide specific support for small-scale installations and demonstration projects. Support only sustainable & low carbon bioenergy (Articles 3, 7, 25, 26, 28 & annex IX) It is crucial that the revised Renewable Energy Directive includes stringent sustainability criteria for the use of bioenergy. The revised Directive should phase out all food and feed based biofuels by 2030, and should not include a renewable energy target for the transport sector. It should not support the use of whole trees for bioenergy production and the use of biomass for electricity production should only be supported when applying highly efficient cogeneration technology. Governance of the Energy Union Regulation Linear trajectories Planning on the basis of linear trajectories for the deployment of renewable energy and energy efficiency between 2021 and 2030 will ensure that both Member States and the EU as a whole will be able to assess whether they are on track to meet their 2030 targets, and if necessary to take corrective action in due time. It is also a necessary provision for investors to feel confident that renewables will grow within their home market, hence giving them certainty to invest. We therefore urge you to support a requirement for Member States to follow linear trajectories between 2021-2030, and ensure the trajectories are binding. As a second best option, the Council should agree on binding biannual milestones for the Commission to use to track progress. Legally binding NECP templates The European Court of Auditors recently published a landscape review of the state of play of EU climate and energy policy and they concluded that the lack of a coherent and robust climate and energy governance system is the main challenge Europe is currently facing in implementing its policy obligations. The commitment of Member States to produce one integrated plan (NECP) and regularly improve it is a good step in the right direction to ensure the transition is properly managed, and a sustainable energy future for Europe is successfully delivered. The NECPs will also be industry’s reference documents for making business: NECPs need to provide the same, standardised and reliable information for all Member States in order to ensure accountability and comparability. Further, revised NECPs should reflect an increase in ambition, as required by the EU’s commitments under the Paris Agreement. To this end, we urge you to to safeguard a binding template, with sufficient level of detail for NECPs. Better guidance on long term provisions To comply with the long term goals of the Paris Agreement, global fossil fuel emissions need to be phased out and should be replaced by 100% renewable energy by 2050 at the latest. The long term climate and energy strategies (Article 14 of the regulation) must be designed to contribute to delivering on the long term objectives of the Paris Agreement. Coherence between the short term plans (NECPs) and ambitious long term strategies must be ensured. The long term climate and energy strategies should also be developed within the same time frame as the NECPs. A binding template for the long term strategies should accompany the binding template for the NECPs. This would help to put in place enabling conditions for the deeper structural changes needed in the economy and energy system to reach the goals of the Paris Agreement. The amendment adopted in the European Parliament on this matter gives good guidance on this.
  • Briefing '27% target = putting the brakes on the EU's renewable energy transition'

    In this briefing, CAN Europe explains why sticking to a 27% renewable energy target would put the brakes on the energy transition in the EU and why the target needs to be raised to at least 45%.
  • Briefing: How the EU Budget post-2020 can serve higher climate ambition

    ‘More for more’: How the EU budget can serve the achievement of 2030 climate and energy targets in line with the Paris Agreement.
See All: Climate & Energy Targets