Letters to Policy Makers

We call upon EU and national leaders to tackle the unprecedented crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic with unity, courage and innovation.

During this time of crisis, which is taking the lives of many and putting people's livelihoods at risk, it is essential that our leaders issue a strong response. We therefore welcome the plans to make substantial funds available to fight the health emergency, tackle unemployment, and support Europe’s small businesses, but more will be needed.

Millions of Europeans long for an end to the lockdown, to be reunited with our family and loved ones, and to get back to work. But we do not want a return to business as usual, to an economic model which has exacerbated social inequalities, jeopardised our health, and driven our planet’s climate and nature to the brink of collapse. Instead, we believe that now is the time to radically and rapidly make our economies greener, fairer, and more resilient to future shocks.

While the immediate priority is to address the public health emergency, public stimulus packages will have to be developed to relaunch the economy, create millions of jobs and support people - especially the most vulnerable - through this difficult time. How we respond to the crisis will determine whether we succeed or fail in the fight against climate change, the loss of nature, widespread pollution and inequality, and create health benefits for all. The EU and its governments must therefore demonstrate leadership and foresight by directing all public stimulus investments at accelerating the transition to a just, resilient and sustainable economy, boosting the European Green Deal to deliver even more.

We call upon political leaders to develop comprehensive EU and national Sustainable Recovery Plans. In particular, this means:

  • Step up policy action against climate change and biodiversity loss at EU, national and international level, by strengthening and continuing the implementation of the targets, strategies and laws announced in the European Green Deal;
  • In high-carbon and other potentially polluting sectors such as intensive agriculture, make support to companies conditional on their alignment with environmental and climate objectives. No bailouts should be given to unviable or polluting industries that have no future in tomorrow’s economy. State aid, loans, subsidies and other direct or indirect support to companies must come with strict conditions, monitored and enforced by the EU, and focus on sustainable initiatives and the creation of sustainable jobs;
  • The establishment of a sizable green recovery fund backed up by all available EU financial tools (including the MFF and its spending programmes, new funds, the use of the European Stability Mechanism and exploring so-called ‘eurobonds’), to finance the green and just recovery. These interventions must be based on established principles such as transparency, accountability and community-driven solutions.
  • Public and private investment throughout the recovery should be guided by the EU’s taxonomy to accelerate the shift from polluting into green sectors; similarly the European Investment Bank should bring its lending policies in line with the European Green Deal objectives by end 2020; In addition, sustainable finance policies should be accelerated and a taxonomy of unsustainable practices to be excluded agreed.
  • All recovery plans must put people’s well-being at the heart of the crisis response and deliver social benefits and protect workers’ rights through a ‘just transition for all’.

We support the many appeals for green recovery that have blossomed across Europe: By 17 EU governments, Members of the European Parliament, the Club of Rome, scientists, NGOs, 200 representatives from business and politics, energy companies, and many more. The European Council had also called on the EU to prepare an economic recovery plan that would integrate the green transition. To these voices we add ours.

Please do not let these calls go unanswered.

SIGNATORIES:

EU (Brussels)
WWF European Policy Office
Transport & Environment (T&E)
BirdLife Europe
Greenpeace European Unit
Friends of the Earth Europe
Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe
European Environmental Bureau (EEB)
CEE Bankwatch Network
Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL)
Naturefriends International

International
Avaaz
WeMove
SumOfUs
Mountain Wilderness International

Belgium
Inter-Environnement Wallonie
Bond Beter Leefmilieu
Climaxi

France
Réseau Action Climat
France Nature Environnement
Fondation Nicolas Hulot
Respire

Germany
Deutsche Umwelthilfe
Verkehrsclub Deutschland VCD

Italy
Legambiente
Cittadini per l’aria
Fondazione per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile
Mountain Wilderness Italia
Club Alpino Italiano
Touring Club Italiano
Italia Nostra Onlus
Lipu-BirdLife Italia
Istituto Nazionale di Urbanistica

Spain
Salvia
Ecodes
Sociedad Civil por el Debate
Red de periodistas rurales
PTP
FER - fundacion renovables
Ecounion

Portugal
Quercus
ZERO

Ireland
An Taisce - National Trust for Ireland

Hungary
Levego

Austria
VCÖ –Mobilität mit Zukunft

Switzerland
Alpine Initiative
Oceancare

The Netherlands
Natuurenmilieu
Milieudefensie

Norway
Bellona Europa

Poland
Polish Ecological Club Mazovian Branch
FPPE
Społeczny Rzecznik Pieszych w Bydgoszczy

Sweden
Naturskyddsföreningen

This appeal is open to signatories from organisations here.

A public petition has also been launched in cooperation with WeMove.eu. It can be signed here.

For more information, please contact Nicolas Derobert, nicolas@caneurope.org

Latest Publications

  • Coal is out. Are the Western Balkans in?

    Are EU member-states in Southeast Europe ready for timely and just transition beyond coal? For the Western Balkans, membership hopefuls, the question is how much longer can public subsidies and Chinese loans keep coal zombie alive at growing cost to health, livelihoods, and the environment?
  • Submission - Feedback on ENTSOS' Proposals for TYNDP 2022 Storylines

    Future energy infrastructure planning in Europe needs to be fully aligned with the Paris Agreement. CAN Europe recommends to increase variation of TYNDP 2022 storylines by assessing higher ambition of greenhouse gas emission reductions. In order to reach the 1.5°C target of the Paris Agreement, a trajectory towards net-zero emissions in 2040 should be assessed. Instead of primarily opposing “decentralised” and “global” solutions in the TYNDP 2022 storylines, at least one scenario should analyse how to prepare European energy infrastructure for a 100% renewable energy system in the most efficient way, combining the best out of both “decentralised” and “global” futures.
See All: Climate & Energy Targets