Letters to Policy Makers

Letter to the European Commission and selected Permanent Representations: the European External Investment Plan

We would like to thank you for organising the CSO consultation on the External Investment Plan (EIP) on the 29th May, 2017. This meeting allowed civil society organisations to ask questions and share their numerous concerns after hearing from the European Commission how it sees the next steps towards implementation.

However, we are not sure those concerns were fully understood, as seen in the exchange between MEPs and the European Commission on the 30th May at the European Parliament DEVE Committee meeting; where our criticisms were reduced to minor issues. As a follow-up, we would like to share in writing our major concerns and recommendations regarding the EIP.

Our concerns and recommendations have already been expressed in two position papers specifically focusing on Pillar 1,[1]  opinion pieces published in the media,[2] blogs,[3] and at the EP hearing.[4] In this letter, we highlight three major recommendations we would like to get a more detailed response from the European Commission on. We go into further detail in the annex of this letter.

1. We insist that the EIP Pillars 1 and 2 be pro-poor, pro-women, promote a climate resilient sustainable development path and human rights and deliver income-generation opportunities for people living in poverty;

2. We urge that there is visible improvement to the process of and to circumscribe the contents to the policy dialogue that is envisaged under Pillar 3 and which underlines Pillars 1 and 2;

3. We request that the Commission raises the bar on transparency, accountability and sustainability of the EIP and ensures strong social and environmental standards are in place.

We remain available for further interaction and exchanges around these constructive proposals.

Yours Sincerely,

Oxfam, ACT Alliance EU, ActionAid, CAN Europe, CARE International, Counter Balance, Eurodad, Global Health Advocates France, ITUC-TUDCN, Plan International, Save the Children, Transparency International EU, with the support of CONCORD

 

Please find the detailed proposals relating to the External Investment Plan in the Annex below:

pdf Annex to CSO letter on the External Investment Plan June 2017 (109 KB)


[1] CSO recommendations for the EIP and EFSD negotiations: https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/joint_cso_recommendations_on_the_european_ext ernal_investment_plan_0.pdf ; http://eurodad.org/files/pdf/58f75ebc4ca05.pdf  ; Eurodad paper: bit.ly/2qJ0SLt ; Romero, MJ. A dangerous blend? The EU’s agenda to ‘blend’ public development finance with private finance. 2013.

Latest Publications

  • Letter to Deputy Ambassadors on a Governance framework compatible with the Paris Agreement

    This letter was sent ahead of the COREPER meeting on 24 November 2017 Dear Deputy Ambassador, This Friday, 24 November, you will be discussing the proposed Regulation on the Governance of the Energy Union. With that in mind we are writing on behalf of our EU-wide network to highlight those aspects of the draft legislation that we consider critical to effective implementation by the EU of the Paris Agreement.
  • European and African NGO recommendations for an EU-Africa Summit that puts climate action at the forefront

    Ahead of the EU-Africa summit taking place in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire on November 28-29, European and African NGOs working on climate change, energy and sustainable development jointly identify some important areas of cooperation to enhance European and African climate action.
  • Report: Juncker Plan backs billions in fossil fuels and carbon-heavy infrastructure

    The European Union is set to continue a funding tool that in last two years has lent billions of euros for fossil fuels projects, finds a new study from CEE Bankwatch Network, CAN Europe, Counter Balance and WWF European Policy Office.
  • Joint NGO statement on the ETS revision

    Being serious about the Paris Agreement:Stop the ETS funding coal, Start a meaningful carbon price This Agreement [...] aims to [...] making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development. Paris Agreement, Article 2(1)c We, the undersigned, urgently appeal to Representatives of European Parliament, Council and the European Commission to ensure that European power and industry are put on the right track to rapidly and cost-effectively reduce their carbon emissions. The European Union was instrumental in designing the Paris Agreement. Now it must implement it. On 8th November, the aforementioned decision-makers will discuss final changes to the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) for the post-2020 period. It is vital that these changes enable the ETS to help deliver the Paris commitments. The recently published UNEP report underlines the urgency to act now in order to ensure that the 1.5°C target remains attainable [1]. One important discussion topic will be the design of the ETS funds. It is crucial that ETS funds stop subsidizing coal plants. We are glad to see that the European Parliament as well as seven Member States [2] have called for ending this misuse of funds. To reach the “well below two degrees” goal agreed at Paris, the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) modelling shows that unabated coal in Europe must fall to zero by 2030: This means that the ETS must no longer fund this obsolete and polluting technology and needs to accelerate a socially just transition instead. The second crucial topic is how to ensure a meaningful carbon price that drives decarbonisation throughout the 2020s and beyond. This can only happen if the cap on the ETS emissions continues to tighten in line with the Paris climate goals, and is adjusted downwards to account for progress. Without this change, the EU carbon market will remain on an inadequate decarbonisation trajectory and risks another decade of irrelevance, leaving the EU lagging behind on green growth and innovation. Fundamentally, the EU ETS must ensure a meaningful carbon price in line with the Paris climate goals, while at the same time stop subsidizing high-carbon intensity technologies such as coal. We count on your support. Kind regards, Carbon Market WatchCEE Bankwatch NetworkCenter for Transport and EnergyChange PartnershipClimate Action Network (CAN) EuropeEfdeN RomaniaInternational Young NaturefriendsSandbagWWF EPOYoung European Federalists11.11.11 Notes: [1] Under current trends, it is expected that in 2030 global efforts to remain on a 1.5°C pathway are 16 to 19 GtCO2 off track. UNEP (2017). The Emissions Gap Report 2017. Available here. [2] Non-paper by Denmark, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Sweden and the UK Joint NGO statement on the ETS revision
See All: Climate & Energy Targets