Letters to Policy Makers

Letter to the European Commission on Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) mid-term evaluation

Dear Mr. Ruijters,

The energy, telecommunications and transport sectors represent significant parts of the EU economy. All three sectors need modernisation to build a solid basis for a competitive and more energy secure European economy that is equipped to meet future challenges, including sustainability and viability in a climate change context.

Re-focussing the Connecting Europe Facility’s support is vital in setting these sectors on the path to deliver a truly modern, sustainable and climate-friendly infrastructure. This is why we recommend you to:

  1. Stop public support to fossil fuel based infrastructure. The EU has repeatedly committed to phasing out fossil fuel subsidies, and this is vital to avoid locking Europe’s infrastructure into a network that is incompatible with the EU’s climate change targets.
  2. Align the investment criteria with the changing character of a modern, sustainable infrastructure. Modern infrastructure is increasingly decentralised, and often cuts across different infrastructure types (e.g. transport electrification, offshore energy networks, smart grids). The CEF needs to ensure it actively supports multi-sector infrastructures that may face higher regulatory barriers, and high-value decentralised infrastructures that have significant cross-border impact without physically crossing borders.
  3. Put energy efficiency & renewable energies first when making assumptions for long-term planning. Planning scenarios that fully reflect the EU’s commitments on greenhouse gas reductions, renewable energy and energy efficiency will avoid investing taxpayers’ money in stranded assets.
  4. Include demand-side measures into the portfolio of infrastructure investments. As they are often more cost-effective than additional supply this will ensure the most effective use of EU budget resources.

The world is changing – and so are European infrastructure needs

The context within which the CEF objectives are being pursued is changing:

  • Technology: The energy system of the future increasingly relies on decentralised and digitally-enabled systems (smart grids, electrified transport) instead of centralised infrastructure alone, with increasing interdependency between infrastructure types.
  • Science and climate: The impacts of a warming climate become more and more apparent as the average global temperature has increased by 1°C – as a direct result of greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel combustion.
  • Policy: The international community has made additional climate and sustainable development commitments, including on limiting global temperature increase to well below 2 degrees Celsius and pursuing efforts to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2015 Paris agreement), committing to ending fossil fuel subsidies by 2025 (G7) and laying a clear development pathway with the Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development.

CEF’s performance needs to be aligned with its own ambitions and the changing context

The European Commission recently recognised the impact of this changing context on its investment policies, acknowledging that “in view of scarce resources in the Member States, public resources should be used smartly. [...] Support should only be given if in line with the long-term energy policy of the European Union, avoiding stranded assets and carbon lock-in.” But at the moment, there is a clear mismatch between the CEF’s initial ambitions, the changing policy context and its practice:

We are looking forward to your response and would be happy to discuss our thoughts in person.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Bankwatch Network
CAN Europe
European Environmental Bureau
Energy Watch Group
E3G
Food and Water Europe
Friends of the Earth Europe
Green Budget Europe
Justice and Environment
Transport and Environment

Latest Publications

  • Report: Juncker Plan backs billions in fossil fuels and carbon-heavy infrastructure

    The European Union is set to continue a funding tool that in last two years has lent billions of euros for fossil fuels projects, finds a new study from CEE Bankwatch Network, CAN Europe, Counter Balance and WWF European Policy Office.
  • Joint NGO statement on the ETS revision

    Being serious about the Paris Agreement:Stop the ETS funding coal, Start a meaningful carbon price This Agreement [...] aims to [...] making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development. Paris Agreement, Article 2(1)c We, the undersigned, urgently appeal to Representatives of European Parliament, Council and the European Commission to ensure that European power and industry are put on the right track to rapidly and cost-effectively reduce their carbon emissions. The European Union was instrumental in designing the Paris Agreement. Now it must implement it. On 8th November, the aforementioned decision-makers will discuss final changes to the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) for the post-2020 period. It is vital that these changes enable the ETS to help deliver the Paris commitments. The recently published UNEP report underlines the urgency to act now in order to ensure that the 1.5°C target remains attainable [1]. One important discussion topic will be the design of the ETS funds. It is crucial that ETS funds stop subsidizing coal plants. We are glad to see that the European Parliament as well as seven Member States [2] have called for ending this misuse of funds. To reach the “well below two degrees” goal agreed at Paris, the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) modelling shows that unabated coal in Europe must fall to zero by 2030: This means that the ETS must no longer fund this obsolete and polluting technology and needs to accelerate a socially just transition instead. The second crucial topic is how to ensure a meaningful carbon price that drives decarbonisation throughout the 2020s and beyond. This can only happen if the cap on the ETS emissions continues to tighten in line with the Paris climate goals, and is adjusted downwards to account for progress. Without this change, the EU carbon market will remain on an inadequate decarbonisation trajectory and risks another decade of irrelevance, leaving the EU lagging behind on green growth and innovation. Fundamentally, the EU ETS must ensure a meaningful carbon price in line with the Paris climate goals, while at the same time stop subsidizing high-carbon intensity technologies such as coal. We count on your support. Kind regards, Carbon Market WatchCEE Bankwatch NetworkCenter for Transport and EnergyChange PartnershipClimate Action Network (CAN) EuropeEfdeN RomaniaInternational Young NaturefriendsSandbagWWF EPOYoung European Federalists11.11.11 Notes: [1] Under current trends, it is expected that in 2030 global efforts to remain on a 1.5°C pathway are 16 to 19 GtCO2 off track. UNEP (2017). The Emissions Gap Report 2017. Available here. [2] Non-paper by Denmark, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Sweden and the UK Joint NGO statement on the ETS revision
  • Letter to Ambassadors on Governance ahead of COREPER meeting on 27 October

    This letter was sent ahead of the COREPER meeting on the 27th of October 2017 Dear Ambassador, During the meeting of COREPER on 27 October you will have the opportunity to provide political guidance on several elements of the Governance regulation, mainly on defining a framework to ensure the delivery of the renewable energy target (Articles 4, 5, 25, 27). The Governance regulation is a key building block of a successful Energy Union, and the nest for many requirements set out in the Paris Agreement on climate change.
  • Briefing on Aligning the EIB Emissions Performance Standard (EPS) with the Paris Agreement

    The European Investment Bank (EIB) is being reviewing its Emissions Performance Standard (EPS) in 2017. Its EPS is part of the EIB Energy Lending Criteria1 adopted in July 2013, and set at a level of 550 g CO2/kWh.
See All: Climate & Energy Targets