Letters to Policy Makers

Letter to Environment Ministers & Climate Attaches on ambitious ETS reforms, no "general approach"

In this letter CAN Europe urges Environment Ministers and national climate attachés to ensure an ambitious ETS reform and not to prematurely come to a conclusion on this file.

Dear Minister

Ahead of the Environment Council, CAN Europe, representing European NGOs working on climate change, would like to summarize our views on the reform of the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS).

For CAN Europe it is crucial that the EU considers its climate policies as a coherent package and policies agreed under the ETS should be in line with policies agreed under the Effort Sharing Regulation to ensure climate action is as ambitious as possible. Given discussions on the Effort Sharing Regulation have only started it would be premature to come to a fixed conclusion on the ETS at this moment.

We are encouraged to hear that the Slovak Presidency has invited Member States to discuss several options to increase the impact of the ETS. Increasing ambition in the ETS is essential, not just to bring the ETS in line with the Paris commitments but also in order to turn the ETS into a functioning policy tool that actually reduces emissions. In order to do so, the carbon budget for phase 4 has to be reduced to create scarcity and to ensure a cost effective decarbonization of our economy.  A combination of the proposed options by the Slovak presidency are necessary:

The new emissions budget for the ETS is determined by two key elements: the initial starting level in 2021 and the rate of emission reductions. Both measures need to be combined to ensure that the ETS reduces emissions and that no new surplus accumulates.

CAN Europe calls for an LRF of 2.8% together with a 2021 starting point for Phase IV that is set at the average 2017-2019 emissions.

Cancellation of allowances

By 2020, the ETS surplus will have grown to between 2.6 and 4.4 billion allowances. The proposed voluntary mechanism for Member States to cancel allowances is insufficient to address this very large surplus. Permanent cancellation of this surplus could bring Europe back onto the least-cost path towards its climate goals. Tightening the Linear Reduction Factor and setting the starting level in 2021 at actual emissions are the primary means of guarding against oversupply in the future, cancellation is the most efficient way of addressing historical oversupply in Europe’s carbon budgets.

CAN Europe calls for:

1. The permanent cancellation of all allowances in the Market Stability Reserve at the end of each period, starting at the end of phase 3. 

2. A mandatory correction for national policies overseen by the Commission, which is permanent (i.e. cancellation) and which adjusts the allowances auctioned by all Member States, not just the Member State where the relevant national policies have been implemented. Action by any single Member State lowers the demand and lowers costs for all Member States, allowing the whole community to free-ride on their efforts. A correction to all Member State auctions should therefore be cost-neutral to national economies. Allowances should be cancelled from the market and not from the MSR in order to correct for the effects of weakened demand on the carbon price.

3. A permanent, mandatory adjustment, must also be extended to adjust for other “overlapping policies” at national and EU level that lower demand.

4. All unallocated allowances from Phase 3 to be cancelled permanently and Phase 4 allowances used for the NER. The 395 million unused Phase 3 allowances should not be used for the NER in Phase 4. Instead, the Phase 4 NER should be created with Phase 4 allowances, thereby reducing the supply of allowances available to the market and raising the EU carbon price.

Market Stability Reserve (MSR)

CAN Europe welcomes the suggestion to increase the feeding rate at which allowances are placed in the MSR but stresses that such a measure would not increase ambition in the ETS but only temporarily reduce the supply of allowances. This measure therefore cannot substitute for the measures listed above. But ensuring companies act sooner rather than later is also necessary to ensure a functioning ETS.

CAN Europe calls for doubling the feeding rate into the MSR until to total allowances in circulation fall into the MSR’s target supply band.

Price corridor

CAN Europe stresses that a price corridor is only effective if the minimum price is set sufficiently high at EUR 30, rising over time, and is accompanied by permanent measures to reduce supply and increase Europe’s ambition.

CAN Europe calls for an auctioning reserve price of €30 from 2021 which increases over time.

We call on you to recognise the urgency and depth of the climate crisis and to ensure the EU reform its flagship climate policy in a way that sets Europe on a path to meet the Paris commitments.

Kind regards, 

Wendel Trio, Director CAN Europe

Latest Publications

  • Letter to Deputy Ambassadors on a Governance framework compatible with the Paris Agreement

    This letter was sent ahead of the COREPER meeting on 24 November 2017 Dear Deputy Ambassador, This Friday, 24 November, you will be discussing the proposed Regulation on the Governance of the Energy Union. With that in mind we are writing on behalf of our EU-wide network to highlight those aspects of the draft legislation that we consider critical to effective implementation by the EU of the Paris Agreement.
  • European and African NGO recommendations for an EU-Africa Summit that puts climate action at the forefront

    Ahead of the EU-Africa summit taking place in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire on November 28-29, European and African NGOs working on climate change, energy and sustainable development jointly identify some important areas of cooperation to enhance European and African climate action.
  • Report: Juncker Plan backs billions in fossil fuels and carbon-heavy infrastructure

    The European Union is set to continue a funding tool that in last two years has lent billions of euros for fossil fuels projects, finds a new study from CEE Bankwatch Network, CAN Europe, Counter Balance and WWF European Policy Office.
  • Joint NGO statement on the ETS revision

    Being serious about the Paris Agreement:Stop the ETS funding coal, Start a meaningful carbon price This Agreement [...] aims to [...] making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development. Paris Agreement, Article 2(1)c We, the undersigned, urgently appeal to Representatives of European Parliament, Council and the European Commission to ensure that European power and industry are put on the right track to rapidly and cost-effectively reduce their carbon emissions. The European Union was instrumental in designing the Paris Agreement. Now it must implement it. On 8th November, the aforementioned decision-makers will discuss final changes to the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) for the post-2020 period. It is vital that these changes enable the ETS to help deliver the Paris commitments. The recently published UNEP report underlines the urgency to act now in order to ensure that the 1.5°C target remains attainable [1]. One important discussion topic will be the design of the ETS funds. It is crucial that ETS funds stop subsidizing coal plants. We are glad to see that the European Parliament as well as seven Member States [2] have called for ending this misuse of funds. To reach the “well below two degrees” goal agreed at Paris, the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) modelling shows that unabated coal in Europe must fall to zero by 2030: This means that the ETS must no longer fund this obsolete and polluting technology and needs to accelerate a socially just transition instead. The second crucial topic is how to ensure a meaningful carbon price that drives decarbonisation throughout the 2020s and beyond. This can only happen if the cap on the ETS emissions continues to tighten in line with the Paris climate goals, and is adjusted downwards to account for progress. Without this change, the EU carbon market will remain on an inadequate decarbonisation trajectory and risks another decade of irrelevance, leaving the EU lagging behind on green growth and innovation. Fundamentally, the EU ETS must ensure a meaningful carbon price in line with the Paris climate goals, while at the same time stop subsidizing high-carbon intensity technologies such as coal. We count on your support. Kind regards, Carbon Market WatchCEE Bankwatch NetworkCenter for Transport and EnergyChange PartnershipClimate Action Network (CAN) EuropeEfdeN RomaniaInternational Young NaturefriendsSandbagWWF EPOYoung European Federalists11.11.11 Notes: [1] Under current trends, it is expected that in 2030 global efforts to remain on a 1.5°C pathway are 16 to 19 GtCO2 off track. UNEP (2017). The Emissions Gap Report 2017. Available here. [2] Non-paper by Denmark, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Sweden and the UK Joint NGO statement on the ETS revision
See All: Climate & Energy Targets