All you need to know about the last phase of the Governance Regulation negotiations

Climate action

The negotiations of the EU’s Energy Union Governance regulation enter the final stretch today, with representatives of the European Parliament, the Council of Ministers and the European Commission meeting for the first informal ‘trialogue’ to negotiate an agreement on the new law which should create a framework for the zero-carbon transition in the EU.

Here is all you need to know about the institutions’ negotiating mandates, with colours indicating our assessement of the positions:

Both the Council and the European Parliament has strengthened the Commission’s original proposal in their positions. The two positions are however far from each other on most aspects, with the Parliament’s position being much more ambitious.

 

Regarding the National Energy and Climate Plans (NECPs), the European Parliament set for a binding template for the NECPs and added into the template many important details, e.g. on phase out of fossil fuel subsidies, Member State’s national trajectories for maintaining and enhancing the carbon removals from sinks as well as trajectories and objectives for energy from renewable sources produced by cities, energy communities and self-consumers.

The Council also agreed the template should be binding, but weakened the Commission’s proposal by allowing many details to be included only “if applicable”.

 

Regarding how to meet the 2030 energy targets – including trajectories and how to ensure there is no ambition gap (gap avoider) or delivery gap (gap filler) – the Parliament opts for linear trajectories for efficiency and nearly linear for renewables  and that any emerging gap with its trajectory is covered within one year by additional measures. 

The Council downgraded the efficiency trajectory to indicative and the renewables trajectory to be made up of 3 reference points which as such is OK, but the % for the 3 points is too low to ensure delivery of the 2030 target.  

 

Lastly, regarding the long term strategies, the Parliament opted for a more ambitious target for 2050 for both the EU and the Member States and added a planning template in an Annex.

The Council agreed that the NECPs and long term strategies must be consistent with each other, but refrained from adding any details on how the strategies should be designed  and did not recognise that the current long term target is inadequate  to deliver on the EU’s commitments to the Paris Agreement. 

 

Summary table with the position of the institutions:

 

Commission

Council

Parliament

NECPs

Binding template

 

Binding template

Binding template

 

Several elements made unbinding

Added new important elements

Deadline 1 January 2019

Deadline 31 December 2019

Deadline 1 January 2019

2030 trajectory renewable energy

Linear

3 reference points:

24% in 2023

40% in 2025

60% in 2027

3 reference points:

20% in 2022

45% in 2025

70% in 2027

2030 trajectory for energy efficiency

Linear

 

Indicative

Linear

2030 “Gap avoider”

RES: MS shall collectively ensure that the sum of their contributions add up. COM may issue recommendations

RES: Commission to use “objective criteria” to assess if there is a gap

RES: Member States shall collectively ensure that the sum of their targets adds up to a linear trajectory

COM may issue non-quantitative recommendations

COM shall issue recommendations; may request MSs pledging too low to increase ambition

Efficiency: MS to set national indicative contributions

Efficiency: MS to set national indicative contributions

Efficiency: MS to set binding national targets

 

2030 “Gap filler”

 

COM may issue recommendations to all MS & shall, as appropriate, take measures at Union level.

Commission may issue recommendations […]

 

COM shall issue recommendations […]

 

 

MS shall ensure by 2024 that any emerging gap is covered by additional measures

MS shall ensure by 2026, 2028 and 2030, that any gap compared to their indicative Union trajectory is covered

MS shall ensure any emerging gap with its trajectory is covered within one year by additional measures

 

Long term strategies

With a 50 year perspective (= 2070)

With a 30 year perspective (= 2050)

 

With a 30 year perspective (= 2050)

To deliver 80-95% emission reductions by 2050

To deliver 80-95% emission reductions by 2050

To deliver net zero GHG emissions by 2050

No consistency guaranteed NECPs/long term strategies

Consistency NECPs/long term strategies required

Consistency NECPs/long term strategies required

No template

No template

A binding template

RELATED NEWS_

Myth buster: Nuclear energy is a dangerous distraction

Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe releases a myth buster to counter the recent hype around nuclear energy. It details why nuclear energy is a dangerous distraction from the transition to a fully renewables-based energy system and threatens to delay the urgently needed phase out of fossil fuels.

Read More »