In order to meet our climate change goals we need to increase natural carbon sinks within the EU to remove CO2 from the atmosphere. Yet the EU’s sink is actually projected to decline between now and 2030, by an estimated 100MT of CO2. To counter this the EU needs to improve its land use accounting rules within the LULUCF regulation. 

However some countries are fighting to undermine land accounting proposals put forward by the Commission last year. The coming weeks are a crucial time to put pressure on ministers and MEPs before ministers discuss the issue on the 19th June at the Environment Council. CAN Europe has taken part in a project coordinated by FERN which reveals the member states with the best and the worst positions on LULUCF. A new website enables users to compare countries’ performance based on their position on the six most important elements of the LULUCF regulation. The ranking reveals some surprises with normally climate friendly countries - France, Finland, Sweden and Austria - trying to weaken proposals.

The site also ranks member states based on their combined LULUCF and ESR position, to provide a fuller picture of how countries are doing in all sectors.

 You can find the LULUCF ranking website here, and a video explaining the why European forests matter for the climate here

Latest Publications

  • Coal is out. Are the Western Balkans in?

    Are EU member-states in Southeast Europe ready for timely and just transition beyond coal? For the Western Balkans, membership hopefuls, the question is how much longer can public subsidies and Chinese loans keep coal zombie alive at growing cost to health, livelihoods, and the environment?
  • Submission - Feedback on ENTSOS' Proposals for TYNDP 2022 Storylines

    Future energy infrastructure planning in Europe needs to be fully aligned with the Paris Agreement. CAN Europe recommends to increase variation of TYNDP 2022 storylines by assessing higher ambition of greenhouse gas emission reductions. In order to reach the 1.5°C target of the Paris Agreement, a trajectory towards net-zero emissions in 2040 should be assessed. Instead of primarily opposing “decentralised” and “global” solutions in the TYNDP 2022 storylines, at least one scenario should analyse how to prepare European energy infrastructure for a 100% renewable energy system in the most efficient way, combining the best out of both “decentralised” and “global” futures.
See All: Climate & Energy Targets